The European Union Establishes Fresh Regulations for Tax-Related Crypto Asset Data Sharing
Introduction
The European Union has introduced new regulations regarding the exchange of information on crypto-assets for tax-related purposes. On May 16, 2023, the Commission expressed its approval of the political agreement reached by EU Finance Ministers regarding enhanced tax transparency rules applicable to service providers facilitating crypto-asset transactions for EU-resident customers.
Also Read: OVERVIEW OF PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL TAXATION AND TREATIES
Effective taxation is crucial for generating public revenue and supporting essential services while fostering an environment conducive to innovation. However, tax authorities currently lack the necessary tools to monitor income generated from the use of crypto-assets, which are easily traded across borders. This limitation significantly hampers their ability to ensure proper tax collection, resulting in the loss of significant tax revenues for European citizens.
For our May newsletter interview, we interviewed Henrik Paulander, the Head of Sector responsible for DG TAXUD’s Administrative Cooperation Unit, to shed light on how the newly established ‘DAC8’ rules will enhance tax transparency within the crypto-assets sector.
Why was DAC 8 necessary?
DAC8 was deemed necessary for various reasons. Crypto-assets represent relatively new technology, and it was imperative to equip Member States with the tools needed to treat these emerging products in a manner consistent with more traditional ones. This approach establishes a fair playing field and ensures equitable taxation.
We also addressed other aspects such as increasing the use of tax identification numbers and implementing rulings for high-net-worth individuals. These measures were introduced because we identified certain loopholes and areas for improvement. We drew inspiration from recommendations made by the European Parliament and the European Court of Auditors to prioritize our efforts.
Why is it essential to exchange information on crypto assets?
Prior to DAC8, there was no mechanism for exchanging information regarding crypto assets. This is particularly important for crypto assets as they are often traded on platforms located outside the trader’s country of residence. Consequently, national tax authorities were unaware of such activities, and some taxpayers may not have even realized the need to declare them. DAC8 establishes a system to rectify this information gap.
What does DAC 8 entail in practical terms?
DAC 8 mandates that Member States establish a system requiring crypto asset service providers to report transactions on an annual basis. This reporting entails detailed information, ensuring both investors and platforms are aware of their obligations and rights.
Currently, some Member States provide pre-filled tax returns, where the tax authorities already possess information about your accounts. With DAC 8, the reporting obligation falls on the platform rather than the citizen.
Does the citizen have any reporting obligations under this directive?
No, according to the directive, citizens are not required to take any action beyond being aware of the reporting process. The platform is responsible for notifying taxpayers that their information will be shared with tax authorities. Interestingly, when individuals know that such information will be reported, they often voluntarily declare it based on national obligations and procedures.
What challenges did you encounter while implementing DAC 8?
Several challenges emerged during the implementation of DAC 8. Firstly, the novelty of the subject matter and the lack of available information, particularly in terms of taxation, presented difficulties. Estimating the tax revenue resulting from this information exchange was a novel exercise, with support from the EU’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) playing a pivotal role.
Secondly, we had to contend with parallel legislation within the EU, including the MICA regulation and new anti-money laundering provisions. These were still in flux during our work, necessitating constant adaptation and alignment with evolving definitions.
Lastly, the international dimension posed a challenge, as we needed to ensure that the EU framework and OECD framework harmonized to meet the needs of Member States. In cases where service providers operated outside the EU, tax authorities had to obtain information. Striking the right balance between OECD and EU rules was a complex task, but ultimately, we aimed to secure positive outcomes for both tax authorities and platforms.
Source: Click here